Do We Still Need RAG If The LLM Context Window Is Infinite?
How does increasing context window size impact the need for RAG?
Welcome to Infinite Curiosity, a newsletter that explores the intersection of Artificial Intelligence and Startups. Tech enthusiasts across 200 countries have been reading what I write. Subscribe to this newsletter for free to directly receive it in your inbox:
The evolution of LLMs has brought remarkable improvements, including the expansion of context windows. Context window refers to the amount of text a model can process in one go. As these windows grow from a few thousand tokens to millions of tokens, their influence on Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems becomes a topic of intrigue. Meta recently released Llama 4 whose context window size is 10 Million tokens. That’s a lot!
Many products use RAG today. I wanted to examine how increasing context windows affects the reliance on RAG. I wanted to see if it diminishes its necessity or reshapes its purpose.
What Is RAG and Why Did We Need It?
RAG integrates LLMs with external retrieval systems. This enables models to pull relevant information from vast datasets to enhance their responses. In the era of smaller context windows, this was a game-changer. Early LLMs were limited to a few thousand tokens. They couldn't hold extensive conversations or incorporate broad knowledge without losing coherence.
RAG bridged this gap by fetching up-to-date or domain-specific data. This made it vital for tasks like answering questions based on recent events or specialized fields. But as context windows keep increasing in size, does RAG still hold the same weight?
How Do Larger Context Windows Change the Game?
With context windows now reaching 10 Million tokens, LLMs can process vast set of documents and store lengthy conversation histories. This shift reduces the need to lean on RAG for every query. For example, a model could summarize a 500-page report or answer questions about a book without retrieving snippets from an external source.
This native processing cuts down on retrieval calls, speeds up responses, and lowers computational costs tied to RAG. In short, tasks that were once dependent on external augmentation (e.g. long-form analysis, creative writing from detailed prompts) can now rely on the model's expanded memory.
Does This Mean RAG Is Becoming Obsolete?
Not quite. While larger context windows lessen RAG's everyday burden, they don't eliminate its relevance. Even a massive context window has limits. It can’t hold the entire internet or stay current beyond its training data. For real time updates such as breaking news or stock market shifts, RAG remains essential to fetch the latest information.
Similarly, highly specialized knowledge like rare medical case studies or obscure legal precedents may not fit into a single context. RAG's ability to pinpoint and retrieve only what's needed keeps it efficient and practical.
What About Cost and Precision?
Here's a burning question: Isn't it expensive to use huge context windows all the time? Yes. Processing tens of thousands of tokens can spike computational costs and latency, especially for simple queries where most of the context is irrelevant. RAG sidesteps this by grabbing just the right data. And this makes it a leaner option in many cases.
Another question: Can bigger context windows guarantee accuracy? Not entirely. In fields like medicine or law, the precision is non-negotiable. So RAG ensures access to verified, authoritative sources. This reduces the risk of hallucination or outdated information baked into the model's training.
So Where Does RAG Fit in the Future?
Increasing context windows doesn't spell the end for RAG. It just redefines the role. For self-contained tasks with accessible data like summarizing a provided document, RAG's role shrinks as LLMs handle more natively. But for dynamic/external/niche needs, it's still indispensable.
The real answer to "Do we still need RAG?" is a hybrid one: context and retrieval will likely coexist, with their balance shifting based on the task. Larger windows empower models to stand alone more often. And RAG steps in for precision, scalability, and real-time relevance.
The rise of expansive context windows transforms the landscape for RAG. It reduces its necessity in some scenarios while reinforcing its value in others. It's not a question of obsolescence but adaptation. RAG evolves from a crutch for limited memory to a tool for targeted efficiency. As LLMs continue to grow, the interplay between context and retrieval will shape a future where both thrive.
If you're a founder or an investor who has been thinking about this, I'd love to hear from you.
If you are getting value from this newsletter, consider subscribing for free and sharing it with 1 friend who’s curious about AI: