Integrating Physics Constraints into AI Models

What does it take to teach physics to an AI model

Welcome to Infinite Curiosity, a weekly newsletter that explores the intersection of Artificial Intelligence and Startups. Tech enthusiasts across 200 countries have been reading what I write. Subscribe to this newsletter for free to receive it in your inbox every week:

---

Integrating physics constraints into AI models is a multi-step process. Why bother doing it? Because it ensures that the models not only learn from data but also adhere to established physical laws and principles. This integration enhances the accuracy of AI predictions in scientific and engineering applications. Here are the steps involved:

Identify the specific physical phenomena to be modeled

This can be fluid dynamics, molecular interactions, or electromagnetic fields. You should define the relevant physical laws and constraints such as conservation laws (e.g. mass, energy, momentum), symmetries (e.g. rotational, translational), and domain-specific equations (e.g. Navier-Stokes equations for fluid dynamics, Schrödinger equation for quantum chemistry).

Collect high-fidelity data that captures the physical phenomena of interest

This data can come from experiments, simulations, or a combination of both. You should preprocess the data to ensure it aligns with the physical constraints. This may involve normalizing the data, ensuring consistency with known physical properties, and removing noise.

Choose a suitable neural network architecture

This needs to suit the problem domain. Common choices include convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for spatial data, recurrent neural networks (RNNs) for temporal data, and graph neural networks (GNNs) for molecular and structural data. You should incorporate physics-informed layers or modules within the network. These layers explicitly encode physical laws and constraints. For example, a physics-informed neural network (PINN) can be designed to solve partial differential equations (PDEs) by incorporating the equations into the loss function.

Use physics-informed loss functions

You should define a loss function that combines traditional data-driven loss components such as mean squared error with physics-based components. The physics-based components penalize deviations from physical laws.

Train the model using the combined loss function

You should ensure that the optimization process respects the physical constraints by monitoring the physics-based loss components during training. Use techniques such as transfer learning and fine-tuning to improve the model's ability to generalize to new, unseen data while maintaining adherence to physical laws.

Perform model validation

Validate the model on separate test datasets that include both standard cases and edge cases where physical laws are critical. We should evaluate the model’s performance not only in terms of traditional metrics (e.g. accuracy, precision) but also in terms of physical consistency and validity.

Incorporate symmetries and invariances

We need to design the model to respect inherent symmetries and invariances in the physical system. For example in molecular modeling, ensure that the model accounts for rotational and translational invariances. Use data augmentation techniques to train the model on symmetrically transformed data.

Post-process the model’s predictions

Why? Because you need to ensure that they are physically meaningful. This may involve additional filtering or correction steps based on known physical constraints.

Interpret the results in the context of the physical system. You can use domain knowledge to assess the model's validity and potential areas for improvement.

Use feedback from physical experiments for continuous improvement

In addition to this feedback, you can use additional simulations to iteratively refine the model. This feedback loop helps the model learn from new data and improve its adherence to physical laws over time. You can explore hybrid modeling approaches that combine AI with traditional numerical methods to leverage the strengths of both.

By systematically integrating physics constraints into AI models, we can achieve more accurate and reliable predictions. This can be crucial in scientific research and engineering applications.

If you're a founder or an investor who has been thinking about this, I'd love to hear from you. I’m at prateek at moxxie dot vc.

---

If you are getting value from this newsletter, consider subscribing for free and sharing it with 1 friend who’s curious about AI: