Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Ambresh's avatar

Thank you for this detailed explanation

Expand full comment
WordMan's avatar

Sounds like ā€œNon-Euclideanā€ is the same thing as ā€œnon-spacial data or spatial data in more than 2 dimensions.ā€ Is that accurate?

Also, I’m a little confused by the discussion about reducing the dimensionality of the data. You talk about 3D data being projected to 2D approximation and how that loses information. But when you talk about 2D data wouldn’t the correct anaology be projecting it to a 1D approximation?

Expand full comment
3 more comments...

No posts